Booksellers Respond to Book Challenges and Bans (publishersweekly.com)

On the closing day of the American Booksellers Association Winter Institute 2023, a keynote and idea exchange tackled book banning and other threats to the freedom to read. Stories of outrage were easy to come by: booksellers report going uninvited to book fairs, moving children’s books off tables occupied by general “adult” titles, or second-guessing whether to host Drag Queen Story Time. But solutions were in shorter supply. Booksellers are frustrated with schools’ and libraries’ capitulations to uninformed book challenges, despite understanding the fears of harassment and violence driving those chilling decisions.

ABA chief communications officer Ray Daniels moderated a panel that included Gender Queer author Maia Kobabe, Rediscovered Books co-owner Laura DeLaney, Green Feather Book Company proprietor Heather Hall, and Kendrick Washington, director of policy at the ACLU of Washington. “I have had a wild ride over the past couple of years,” said Kobabe, whose memoir tops the American Library Association’s list of 10 most-challenged books. “I have seen a rise of book sales, but I think most of those sales are to adults and people who listen to NPR. People in book deserts are the ones missing out. We shouldn’t have to have a lawsuit in every single school district just to have the books in schools and libraries. It’s such a drain on resources.”
read more at: https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/bookselling/article/91643-wi2023-booksellers-respond-to-book-challenges-and-bans.html

Related Posts

Kohl’s Reports Second Quarter Fiscal 2023 Financial Results

Second Quarter 2023 Results *Net sales decreased 4.8% year-over-year, to $3.7 billion, with comparable sales down 5.0%. *Gross margin as a percentage of net sales was 39.0%, a decrease of 61 basis points. *Selling, general & administrative (SG&A) expenses increased 1.6% year-over-year, to $1.3 billion. *Operating income was $163 million compared to $266 million in the prior year. *Net income was $58 million. This compares to net income of $143 million. *Inventory was $3.5 billion, a decrease of 14% year-over-year. *Operating cash flow was $430 million.

Macy’s, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2020 Results

Second Quarter Highlights: *Comparable sales were down 34.7% on an owned basis and down 35.1% on an owned plus licensed basis, due to faster paced store recovery than originally modeled and better than expected growth of digital business. *Digital sales remained strong, growing 53% over second quarter 2019. Digital sales penetrated at 54% of total owned comparable sales. *Delivered gross margin of 23.6%, an improvement of approximately 650 basis points from first quarter 2020 due to improved retail margins from mix and better sell through of clearance merchandise. *Inventory was down 29% from a year ago, allowing the company to exit second quarter in a clean inventory position. *Finished the quarter in a strong liquidity position with approximately $1.4 billion in cash and approximately $3 billion of untapped capacity in the company’s new asset-based credit facility.

Association of American Publishers Statement on Important Valancourt Books Decision

The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled today in favor of Valancourt Books, a small Virginia publisher and AAP member company, in an important copyright case that rejects the Government’s argument that depositing books with the Library of Congress without compensation and under threat of substantial penalties is a condition of copyright protection. In reversing the lower court, the Appeals Court also rejected the Government’s position that abandoning one’s copyrights within the current legal framework is a viable alternative to avoiding the deposit requirement. The opinion found “mandatory deposit” (section 407 of the Copyright Act) unconstitutional as applied to physical books. In the case, the Library made repeated demands for copies of Valancourt titles under the pain of fines despite Valancourt’s objections that they would be costly to provide. The Court did not address the publisher’s First Amendment claim because it was unnecessary to do so. AAP’s amicus curiae brief in support of Valancourt was cited in the opinion.
Back To Top
×Close search
Search